|
KMID : 1025520100520010029
|
|
Journal of Animal Science and Technology
2010 Volume.52 No. 1 p.29 ~ p.36
|
|
|
The Influence of Phase Feeding Methods on Growth Performance, Meat Quality, and Production Cost in Growing-Finishing Pigs.
|
|
Jeong Tae-Sam
Heo Pil-Seung
Lee Geon-Young
Ju Won-Seok
Kim Yoo-Yong
|
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
|
This experiment was conducted to evaluate the influence of phase feeding methods on growth performance, carcass characteristics, pork quality, and economical efficiency in growing-finishing pigs. A total of 120 crossbred pigs([Yorkshire× Landrace]×Duroc), average initial body weight 25.23±2.66kg, were allotted to 5 treatments by body weight and sex in a randomized complete block(RCB) design. Each treatment had 6 replicates with 4 pigs per pen. The treatments were 1) A(fed late weaner feed during whole phase), 2) B(fed late weaner feed in growing phase and grower feed in finishing phase), 3) C (fed grower feed during whole phase), 4) D(fed grower feed in growing phase and early finisher feed in early and late finishing phase), 5) E(fed grower feed in growing phase, early finisher feed in early finishing phase and late finisher feed in late finishing phase). Commercial diets bought from private feed company were used for this experiment. During the early growing phase(6 wks), treatments A and B showed higher growth performance than that of other treatments(P<0.05). However, growth performance tended to be similar among treatments at 10 wks after feeding and there was no difference in time of market weight(13 wks). Moreover, blood urea nitrogen(BUN) concentration was lowered in treatment E than other treatments during whole experimental period(P<0.01). Carcass characteristics and pork quality were measured when body weight of pigs reached at 110.33±2.1kg. Days to market weight(110kg), quality grade, pork color, and pork pH did not show any significant difference among treatments. These results suggested that phase feeding based upon growth stages of pigs showed no detrimental effects on growth performance and the pork quality. Moreover, feed cost was saved approximately 37% by phase feeding method without delaying of days to market weight compared to general conventional feeding method(B) of swine farm in Korea.
|
|
|
KEYWORD
|
|
|
Growing-finishing pigs, Phase feeding method, Feed cost
|
|
|
FullTexts / Linksout information
|
|
|
|
|
|
Listed journal information
|
|
|
|
|